Objectives + AI 

Task: Generate learning objectives  by copying text into Gemini

Question: How relevant are AI generated learning objectives?

The goal of this activity is to find out if Gemini generate relevant and properly formatter learning objectives.  If it can, it has the potential to save me lots of time.

I am wondering if it makes sense to use Gemini to create a first draft of learning objectives. Writing objectives can be difficult, and it would be nice to use Gemini  to get started. 

Prompt

Please generate learning objectives for this text:[copy and paste text into bard]

Source data

For this exercise: I copied and pasted a document on Earthquake Preparedness and Response from https://www.osha.gov/earthquakes


Gemini 's response

Learning Objectives based on the earthquake text:

Knowledge:

Skills:

Attitudes:

Additional Learning Objectives:

These learning objectives can be adapted and expanded to create educational materials for different audiences, including school curricula, workplace training programs, and community awareness campaigns


Evaluating Gemini 's response

Bloom's verbs 

Bard used verbs found in Bloom's taxonomy for knowledge, skills, and attitudes.  The objectives were written in a professional manner that aligns with instructional design norms. 

Evaluating Gemini 's response: Knowledge objectives  | Score: 4.5/6 

Are the knowledge objectives accurate, appropriate and aligned to the article?

Let's go objective by objective.


Objective 1. "Describe the phenomenon of earthquakes: Understand the causes of earthquakes, including plate tectonics and the release of accumulated energy."

I think this objective is relevant.


Objective 2. "Identify the risks associated with earthquakes: Recognize the potential dangers of ground shaking, collapsing structures, flying debris, and other secondary hazards."

I think this objective is relevant and aptly captures the essence of the article.


Objective 3. "Explain the concept of liquefaction: Understand how saturated soil can liquefy during an earthquake and the risk it poses in specific areas."

I think this objective is relevant.


Objective 4. "Distinguish between direct and indirect earthquake injuries: Recognize that most earthquake injuries result from falling objects and collapsing structures, not directly from ground movement."

This objective was remarkable because the text did not mention 'direct or indirect' injuries. Bard was able to infer that this was a key point from this paragraph:

"Ground movement during an earthquake is seldom the direct cause of death or injury. Most earthquake-related injuries result from collapsing walls or floors, flying glass, and falling objects as a result of the ground shaking or people trying to move more than a few feet during the shaking. "


Objective 5. "Outline the importance of earthquake preparedness: Understand the benefits of creating emergency plans, conducting drills, and equipping workplaces with supplies."

This article doesn't go over the importance or benefits of creating emergency plans. Irrelevant. 


Objective 6. "Identify employer responsibilities for earthquake safety: Recognize the legal obligation of employers to protect workers from foreseeable dangers during response and recovery efforts".

I think this objective is semi-relevant. The article doesn't mention the phrase 'legal obligations' uses the term 'responsibilities'.  

Evaluating Gemini 's response: Skill objectives   | Score: 0/5 

Are the skill objectives accurate, appropriate and aligned to the article?


Let's go objective by objective. 

Objective 1. "Develop an earthquake emergency plan: Participate in creating a plan for your workplace that includes evacuation procedures, communication protocols, and emergency supply management."

The original article links to a page on developing an emergency response plan, but there's no mention of evacuation, communication protocol or 'supply management'. This is a hallucination. 

So I think a more relevant objective would be: "Identify resources for emergency planning"


Objective 2. "Perform earthquake drills: Practice procedures and roles within the emergency plan to ensure effectiveness and familiarity in a real-world situation."

The article doesn't mention 'drills' or 'practice procedures'. So this objective is irrelevant. 


Objective 3. "Assemble and maintain an emergency supply kit: Collect and store essential items for survival and preparedness in the event of an earthquake or other disaster."

The article notes that employers need to equip employees with emergency supply kits, but it doesn't go over how to assemble or maintain a kit. 

So I think a more relevant objective would be: "Identify ways employers can prepare for an earthquake"


Objective 4. "Identify and mitigate earthquake hazards in the workplace: Learn to recognize potential hazards within your working environment and take steps to minimize risks beforehand."

The article links to an page that identifies over areas to avoid, including "health hazards arising from collapsing walls, falling objects and debris." I would say BARD is close here, but this article doesn't cover this topic, so this objective is irrelevant.


Objective 6. "Follow safety instructions after an earthquake: Understand and respond to official guidance, avoiding unsafe areas and hazardous materials, and prioritizing personal safety."

This article doesn't cover this topic, so this objective is irrelevant.

Evaluating Gemini 's response:  Attitude objectives | Score: 2/5 

Are the skill objectives accurate, appropriate and aligned to the article?

Let's go objective by objective.


Objective 1. "Exhibit a commitment to earthquake preparedness: Actively participate in planning, training, and practicing safety measures to be prepared for an earthquake."

I think this objective is relevant.


Objective 2. "Maintain awareness of earthquake risks: Stay informed about local earthquake hazards and potential vulnerabilities in your area."

I think this objective is relevant and aptly captures the essence of the article.


Objective 3. "Promote a culture of safety in the workplace: Encourage colleagues and superiors to prioritize safety procedures and take earthquake preparedness seriously."

This article doesn't cover this topic, so this objective is irrelevant.


Objective 4. "Remain calm and composed during an earthquake: React to the shaking with a well-rehearsed plan and avoid panic to ensure personal safety and minimize the risk of injuries."

This article doesn't cover this topic, so this objective is irrelevant.


Objective 6. "Support emergency response efforts: Be willing to assist others and follow instructions from designated authorities after an earthquake has occurred."

This article doesn't cover this topic, so this objective is irrelevant.

Question: How relevant are AI generated learning objectives?

Answer:  

The knowledge-level learning objectives were mostly relevant. If I change the prompt to "Please generate Knowledge-level' learning objectives for this text:[copy and paste text into Gemini". the results might be more useful,

The skill and attitude objectives were largely irrelevant.

At this point, It took me more time to evaluate the learning objectives than it would to actually write them myself.

Question: How can I rewrite the prompt to get a better response?

Answer:  

I asked Gemini how I could improve the original prompt. Gemini offered some useful tips:

1. Define the target audience:

2. Focus on specific key points: